Storming the Vatican
The two popes of the great reset: Klaus Schwab and Jorge Bergoglio in their religious garb.
Pope Francis is a reprobate and a heretic. He should have been deposed long ago.
The Catholic faithful and people of good faith throughout the world really deserve someone who actually has an original thought in his head. We deserve a pope who views Sacred Scripture and Sacred Doctrine not as confining obstacles but rather as divine gifts; salvific messaging to man who is lost in the wilderness.
Jorge Bergoglio is nothing but a scourge on the Church. He sows division and empowers the haughty, all the while posing and posturing as a great defender of the poor. His globalistic communism, which has been on display since the early days of his pontificate, is almost as idiotic and contemptible as his rejection of the basic teachings of Our Lord and His Church.
Early on, in his torturously dumb and willfully blind encyclical Laudato Si, he advocated for a new world order. Thanks Pope Klaus Schwab. And now, he’s at it again, supplicating before the elites of the elites, demanding that they work to eviscerate individual free will and agency and mandate everything from the global green new deal to forced vaccinations. So much for “scattering the proud in their conceit”. Bergoglio gives them sanction and comfort to render the lowly, lowlier.
What’s it going to take then? When will the men among the bishops, who are successors to the apostles (woefully poor ones, self-evidently), make a move? He has to go. There has to be more Viganos out there, right?! They have to recognize that tolerance can be a terrible vice, correct? Depose him in the most charitable and instructive of ways of course, but also in the most cleansing sort of storms. Root out the infection of corruption, heterodoxy, cowardice, gluttony, and abuse facilitated by Francis himself, the disease that is eating away at the Body of Christ. I would recommend a Napoleonic end: Make him bishop of Elba, St. Helena or Easter Island with no real authority to ruin the churches (as he inevitably would) in those locales.
Or better, Devil’s Island. The name is coincidental only, bien sûr. A just man, once falsely accused, resided there only to gain partial exoneration. In a unique twist then, Bergoglio can take with him to his new, isolated residence the painting of an effeminate Christ ministering(?) to Judas, who of course can’t be in hell after all.
Sure, Jesus damned him repeatedly, but Jesus also was a dogged advocate for and protector of human freedom, the kind of individual human agency the pope and his cadre of snakes find so deplorable, so why listen to Him? The truth is that Pope Francis and his bootlickers do not possess the charisma nor the persuasive talents the fawning media so desperately wish they had. The truth is not in them, so they have to ally with the state and advocate coercion. Look no further than Germany, where the Church and Berlin (of all places) have formed such an unholy union. Much of the German Church is in open schism in a race to see who is going to be the last disaffected, enlightened “Catholic” to turn the lights out in Munich and Cologne. Allied bombs did less damage than the current episcopacy under Francis.
So Alfred Dreyfus made Devil’s Island famous as an innocent man unjustly condemned. Pope Francis would make it famous again for his sinister attempt to justify, to render innocent a justly condemned man–Christ’s betrayer himself. Judas was a rejected apostle who the Devil entered upon invitation. Convenient bedfellows indeed.
There’s some otherworldly, historical, and poetic justice in that.
One Response
Bergoglio’s worse than a heretic. A heretic would eventually leave the Church like Luther. He wants to damage the Church from within. cf. Tosatti book translation about Francis turning a blind eye and/or defending abusers. Demonic.